Taming Change Excerpt -- Just Where Does All of Your Resource Capacity Really Go?
Doesn't it seem incredulous (especially to your customers) that despite all of the staff you have in your organization, there always seems to be a shortage of people for project work? Or worse yet, those that are given project tasks are often unavailable just when they are needed to keep critical path on track.
So, just how much capacity really is available to innovate, compared to keeping the wheels on the operational wagon? This excerpt from Taming Change with Portfolio Management (shipping to book stores in June) offers you an idea of what actual capacity utilization analysis typically reveals. It also helps explain why using common availability assumptions may have some of you working sixty hours a week.
Understanding Total Capacity Utilization -- Where Does It Go?
|
Analyzing true staff capacity can yield surprising results compared to common utilization perceptions and assumptions. As an example, a staff of 500 can be broken down as follows (all values listed are typical approximations): Typical Staff Head Count by Type
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
For the 435 individual contributors, work availability breaks down as follows (in hours):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Given the 567,100 potential hours of effort remaining to accomplish deliverables, the following reflects typical effort utilization by general work type:
Thus, the typical net effective head count available for formal project work is only about 55 FTEs of the total 500-person workforce, or about 12 percent of the total staff effort available. In practical planning terms, this is enough effort to execute about a dozen medium-sized projects. While this analysis uses general assumptions, they are useful as working numbers until you can measure and analyze your own specific circumstances. You should be able to provide a reliable breakdown of net capacity by work type based on actual historical results to make accurate future forecasts and estimates. |


